Linkedin mailing list5/21/2023 But an explanation is something more: It includes not only descriptions and predictions but also counterfactual conjectures like “Any such object would fall,” plus the additional clause “because of the force of gravity” or “because of the curvature of space-time” or whatever. A prediction might have been the statement “The apple will fall if I open my hand.” Both are valuable, and both can be correct. You observe the result and say, “The apple falls.” That is a description. Suppose you are holding an apple in your hand. Here is the post from Terry Sejnowski: I have always been impressed with Chomsky's ability to use plausible arguments to make his case even when they were fallacious. So caution is advised when mass media tries to summarize and draw conclusions on LLMs. If the debate demonstrates anything then that there is no consensus among scientists despite a lot of thoughts devoted to the topic of Large Language Models. The entire discussion can be found at (search for “apple”). Sejnowski’s initial post “Chomsky’s apple” ( ) is reproduced below. Participants are well-known scientists like Geoffrey Hinton, Gary Marcus, Stephen José Hanson, a.o. Currently, there is a lively debate on Large Language Models started by Terrence Sejnowski (Salk Institute, Editor of “Neural Computation”). The Connectionists mailing list is a moderated forum with a history going back to the 1980-ies, where researchers lead discussions regarding deep learning, artificial intelligence, and related topics.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |